Skip to main content

Table 3 Association between CMI and CAP using two-piecewise linear regression

From: Association between cardiometabolic index and controlled attenuation parameter in U.S. adults with NAFLD: findings from NHANES (2017–2020)

 

Adjusted β (95% CI), p value

Model 1 (linear regression)

10.40 (7.14, 13.67), < 0.0001

Model 2 (segmented regression)

    Turning point(K)a

1.43

    CMI < K effect

14.58 (9.03, 20.14), < 0.0001

    CMI > K effect

3.74 (−4.13, 11.61), 0.3519

    p for log-likelihood ratio

0.066

  1. Fully adjusted model: age, gender, race, education level, marital status, smoking, moderate work activity, PIR, SBP, DBP, BMI, LSM, UA, LDL-C, ALT, AST, ALB, GGT, diabetes and stroke
  2. CMI Cardiometabolic index
  3. aTwo-step recursive method was employed to determine the inflection point
Back to article page

Lipids in Health and Disease

ISSN: 1476-511X