Table 4 Association of NC with visceral adiposity indicators: linear regression
From: Neck circumference as an independent indicator of visceral obesity in a Chinese population
Dependent variables | Male | Female | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β | B (95% CI) | P | R 2 | β | B (95% CI) | P | R 2 | |
WC (model 1) | 0.600 | 2.090 (2.003–2.177) | < 0.001 | 0.360 | 0.570 | 2.224 (2.139–2.310) | < 0.001 | 0.325 |
WC (model 2) | 0.565 | 1.974 (1.887–2.061) | < 0.001 | 0.446 | 0.483 | 1.871 (1.795–1.947) | < 0.001 | 0.509 |
WHR (model 1) | 0.323 | 0.009 (0.008–0.010) | < 0.001 | 0.105 | 0.329 | 0.010 (0.009–0.011) | < 0.001 | 0.108 |
WHR (model 2) | 0.304 | 0.008 (0.007–0.009) | < 0.001 | 0.208 | 0.248 | 0.008 (0.007–0.008) | < 0.001 | 0.313 |
WHtR (model 1) | 0.526 | 0.011 (0.010–0.012) | < 0.001 | 0.276 | 0.509 | 0.013 (0.013–0.014) | < 0.001 | 0.259 |
WHtR (model 2) | 0.504 | 0.011 (0.010–0.011) | < 0.001 | 0.414 | 0.412 | 0.011 (0.010–0.011) | < 0.001 | 0.503 |
LnVAI (model 1) | 0.361 | 0.095 (0.087–0.102) | < 0.001 | 0.130 | 0.297 | 0.076 (0.069–0.082) | < 0.001 | 0.088 |
LnVAI (model 2) | 0.324 | 0.085 (0.077–0.093) | < 0.001 | 0.169 | 0.221 | 0.056 (0.050–0.063) | < 0.001 | 0.218 |
LnLAP (model 1) | 0.521 | 0.186 (0.176–0.195) | < 0.001 | 0.271 | 0.465 | 0.175 (0.167–0.184) | < 0.001 | 0.216 |
LnLAP (model 2) | 0.477 | 0.170 (0.161–0.180) | < 0.001 | 0.352 | 0.375 | 0.141 (0.134–0.149) | < 0.001 | 0.454 |
LnAVI (model 1) | 0.605 | 0.049 (0.047–0.051) | < 0.001 | 0.366 | 0.574 | 0.054 (0.052–0.056) | < 0.001 | 0.329 |
LnAVI (model 2) | 0.570 | 0.046 (0.044–0.048) | < 0.001 | 0.455 | 0.487 | 0.046 (0.044–0.048) | < 0.001 | 0.512 |
Cindex (model 1) | 0.675 | 2.132 (2.059–2.205) | < 0.001 | 0.456 | 0.612 | 2.018 (1.948–2.087) | < 0.001 | 0.374 |
Cindex (model 2) | 0.634 | 2.007 (1.933–2.081) | < 0.001 | 0.512 | 0.535 | 1.749 (1.684–1.813) | < 0.001 | 0.505 |