Skip to main content

Table 4 LDL of various groups of rats in 60 days study trial

From: Phytochemical composition, antilipidemic and antihypercholestrolemic perspectives of Bael leaf extracts

Rat Groups

LDL (mg/dL)

 

Day-0

Day-30

Day-60

Control

 G0

134.10 ± 2.13Ab

134.24 ± 2.44aB

134.24 ± 2.40Aa

 G1

141.69 ± 2.72Aa

138.23 ± 2.5Ab

134.66 ± 2.35Ac

 G2

138.71 ± 2.19Aa

132.34 ± 2.55Bb

125.34 ± 2.20Bc

Net Changes in Control Group

 G1 - G0

7.59 ± 0.59b

3.99 ± 0.06e

0.42 ± 0.05h

 G2 - G0

4.61 ± 0.06d

1.90 ± 0.11g

8.90 ± 0.20a

 G2 - G1

2.98 ± 0.53f

5.89 ± 0.05c

9.32 ± 0.15a

HPL Group

 Gh0

140.07 ± 2.70aC

164.55 ± 2.79Ab

186.68 ± 3.39Aa

 Gh1

143.25 ± 2.05aA

120.24 ± 2.15Bb

95.56 ± 1.34Bc

 Gh2

143.33 ± 2.13aA

114.44 ± 2.11Cb

79.32 ± 1.98Cc

Net Changes in HPL Group

 Gh1 - Gh0

3.18 ± 0.65g

44.31 ± 0.64d

91.12 ± 2.05b

 Gh2 - Gh0

3.26 ± 0.57g

50.11 ± 2.11c

107.36 ± 1.41a

 Gh2 - Gh1

0.08 ± 0.07h

5.80 ± 0.04f

16.24 ± 0.64e

  1. Mean ± Standard Deviation; n = 10
  2. G0: Control Normal rat group. G1: Normal rat group fed on 125 mg
  3. bael leaf extract. G2: Normal rat group fed on 250 mg bael leaf extract
  4. Gh0: Control Hyperlipidemic rat group. Gh1: Hyperlipidemic rat group fed on 125 mg
  5. bael leaf extract. Gh2: Hyperlipidemic rat group fed on 250 mg bael leaf extract
  6. HPL: Hyperlipidemic group of rats
  7. Means showing different lower case letters (a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h) represent significant differences (p < 0.05) within control or HPL groups. Whereas, means showing different upper case letters (A, B, C) represent significant differences (p < 0.05) across day-0 through day-60