Study | Subject Characteristics | n-3 PUFA Source and Dose | Study Design | Duration | Lipid Outcomes | Other Findings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Average baseline TG, Total-C, LDL-C (mg/dL) | ||||||
Fakhrzadeh (2010) [43] | 73 females, 51 males | 1 capsule of fish oil | Randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, parallel arm | 26Â weeks | TG levels increased 15Â % in the placebo group and decreased 2Â % in the treatment group (sig. between group effect) | Â |
Age: 65+ | ||||||
(TG – 145, Total-C - 190, LDL-C - 114) | 0.18 g EPA + 0.12 g DHA | LDL-c, HDL-c, or total-c did not change | ||||
Vs. | ||||||
Placebo | ||||||
Sanders (2011) [44] | 225 female, 142 males | 3 capsules of fish oil (1:5 ratio of EPA:DHA) containing: | Randomized, placebo controlled, parallel arm, double-blind | 52Â weeks | TG levels reduced 16.5Â % by 1.8Â g/day, and was unchanged in both 0.45Â g/day and 0.9Â g/day (sig) | No change in blood pressure, arterial stiffness, or measures of endothelial function after supplementation |
Age: 45–70 | ||||||
(TG – 100, Total-C - 210, LDL-C - 125) | a) 0.45 g n-3 PUFA | |||||
Vs. | ||||||
b) 0.9Â g n-3 PUFA | Total-c , HDL-c and LDL-c was unchanged after supplementation at each dose | |||||
Vs. | ||||||
c) 1.8Â g n-3 PUFA | ||||||
Vs. | ||||||
Placebo | ||||||
Hlais (2013) [45] | 112 males | Fish oil (FO) capsules (Per gram: 0.737 g of n-3 PUFA: 0.495 g EPA + 0.196 g DHA): | Randomized, single blind, parallel arm study | 6 and 12 weeks | After 6 weeks : | No significant effects on glycemic and blood pressure parameters were noted |
Age: 18–35 | ||||||
(TG – 125, Total-C - 187, LDL-C - 118) | A) 2 g of FO | TG was reduced by 15 %, 4 %, 10 % in Groups A, B, D, respectively, and elevated by 6 %, 3 % in Groups C, E, respectively (only group A was sig) | ||||
Vs. | ||||||
B) 1Â g of FO and 8Â g of sunflower oil | ||||||
Vs. | Total-c and LDL-c was elevated by 2-8Â % in Groups A, B, C, E (non-sig) and by 7Â % and 13Â % in Group D, respectively (sig) | |||||
C) 2Â g of FO and 8Â g of sunflower oil | ||||||
Vs. | HDL-c was elevated by 4-6Â % in Groups A, C, D and reduced by 10Â % and 3Â % in Groups B, E, respectively (non-sig) | |||||
D) 4Â g of FO and 8Â g of sunflower oil | ||||||
Vs. | ||||||
After 12Â weeks : | ||||||
TG was reduced by 12Â %, 12Â %, 2Â %, 5Â % in Groups A, B, D, E respectively, and elevated by 1Â % in Groups C (non-sig) | ||||||
Total-c was elevated by 4Â % in Groups A, D, and reduced by 1Â %, 4Â % and 10Â % in groups B, C, E, respectively (only Group E was sig) | ||||||
E) 8Â g of sunflower oil | LDL-c was elevated by 3-7Â % in Groups A, B, D (non-sig) and reduced by 5Â % and 13Â % in Group C, E, respectively (only Group E was sig) | |||||
HDL-c was elevated by 6Â %, 2Â % in Groups A, D, respectively, and reduced by 5-7Â % in Groups B, C, E, (non-sig) | ||||||
Nilsson (2012) [46] | 28 females, 10 males | 5 capsules of fish oil | Randomized, placebo controlled, crossover study | 5Â weeks | TG reduced 12Â % (sig) | Systolic and Diastolic blood pressure was reduced by 5Â % |
Age: 51–72 | 1.5 g EPA, 1.05 g DHA, and 0.45 g of other n-3 PUFA | |||||
(TG – 142) | ||||||
Inflammatory markers were unchanged | ||||||
Vs. | ||||||
Placebo | ||||||
Rizza (2009) [47] | 25 females, 25 males | 2 capsules of fish oil (0.6Â g EPA, 0.4Â g DHA per capsule) | Randomized, double-blind, parallel designed, placebo controlled | 12Â weeks | TG levels reduced 26Â % with treatment (sig) | Improvement in flow mediated dilation in treatment group |
Age: 29.9+/− 6.6 | ||||||
(TG – 118, Total-C - 192, LDL-C - 122) | Vs. | HDL-c, LDL-c and total-c did not change | ||||
Placebo | ||||||
Lovegrove (2004) [48] | 84 Males | 4 capsules of fish oil | Randomized, double bind, placebo controlled, parallel arm | 12Â weeks | TG was reduced 31Â % (sig) | Â |
Age: 30–70 | 1.5 g EPA, 1.0 g DHA | HDL-c increased (sig) | ||||
(TG – 128, Total-C - 207, LDL-C - 128) | Vs. | No effect on total-c or LDL-c was observed | ||||
Placebo | ||||||
Ciubotaru (2003) [49] | 30 Post Menopausal Females on Hormone Replacement Therapy | Fish oil | Randomized, double blind, placebo controlled | 5Â weeks | TG reduced 26Â % in group receiving 14Â g of fish oil (sig) and 4Â % in group receiving 7Â g of fish oil | CRP reduced, IL-6 reduced in groups receiving fish oil supplements |
Randomized to three groups: | ||||||
Age: 60+/− 5 | a) 14 g safflower oil (0 g EPA/DHA) | |||||
(TG – 121, Total-C - 220, LDL-C - 126) | ||||||
Vs. | Group receiving safflower oil alone experienced a 21Â % increase in TG levels | |||||
b) 7 g safflower oil + 7 g fish oil (1.45 g EPA + DHA) | ||||||
No change in LDL-c or total-c | ||||||
Vs. | ||||||
14Â g fish oil | ||||||
(2.9Â g EPA+ DHA) | ||||||
Offman (2013) [50] | 15 Females, 37 Males | Fish oil: 4 g of Epanova or 4 g of Lovaza | Open label, parallel group cohorts | 2 weeks | Participants receiving Epanova had reductions in TG, HDL-c and LDL-c of 21 %, 5 % and 4 %, respectively | Epanova raised plasma total EPA + DHA concentrations 3 times the level as subject’s receiving Lovaza |
Age: 18–55 | ||||||
(TG – 166, Total-C - 189, LDL-C - 128) | Lovaza: 1.8 g of EPA, 1.5 g of DHA | |||||
Participants receiving Lovaza had reductions in TG and HDL-c levels of 8Â % and 7Â %, respectively, while raising LDL-c by 0.4Â % | ||||||
Epanova: 2.2Â g of EPA and 0.8Â g of DHA | ||||||
(effects on TG between groups were significant) | ||||||
Laidlaw (2003) [51] | 31 Females | Fish oil capsules (4 g of EPA + DHA) with: | Randomized, parallel arm study | 4 weeks | TG was reduced 35-40 % in groups receiving 0 g, 1 g and 2 g of GLA (sig), and TG was reduced 7 % in the group receiving 4 g of GLA |  |
Age: 36–68 | ||||||
(TG – 112, Total-C - 213, LDL-C - 134) | 0 g of gamma-linolenic acid (GLA) | |||||
Vs. | All groups had reductions in total-c of 1-9Â % | |||||
1Â g of GLA | LDL-c was reduced in all groups by 2-13Â %, except in the group receiving 1Â g of GLA (only sig in the group receiving 2Â g of GLA) | |||||
Vs. | ||||||
2Â g of GLA | ||||||
Vs. | ||||||
4Â g of GLA | ||||||
Mann (2010) [52] | 19 Females, 11 Males | 10 capsules containing: | Randomized, double-blind, parallel designed study | 2Â weeks | TG was reduced 25Â % in the group receiving Seal oil and 21Â % in the group receiving Tuna oil (sig) | CRP was reduced by 11Â % and 25Â % in the groups receiving tuna oil and fish oil, respectively |
Age: 20–50 | Tuna oil (0.21 g of EPA, 0.03 g of DPA, 0.81 g of DHA) | |||||
(TG – 120, Total-C - 196, LDL-C - 134) | ||||||
Vs. | ||||||
Seal oil (0.34Â g of EPA, 0.23Â g of DPA, 0.45Â g of DHA) | LDL-c was elevated through both interventions by 3Â % | |||||
Vs. | ||||||
Placebo | ||||||
Vanschoonbeek (2004) [53] | 20 Males | 9 capsules of fish oil:1.05Â g EPA, 0.75Â g, DHA, and 1.2Â g other n-3 PUFA | Intervention (no placebo, compared initial vs. final values) | 4Â weeks | TG was reduced 10Â % (sig) | Treatment lowered integrin activation, as well as plasma levels of fibrinogen and factor V |
Age: 48.5+/− 9.8 | Total-c was unchanged | |||||
(TG – 141, Total-C - 218, LDL-C - 151) | LDL-c increased 5 % and remained borderline high | |||||
Di Stasi (2004) [54] | 18 Females, 18 Males | Fish Oil Capsules (46Â % and 39Â % of n-3 PUFA was EPA and DHA, respectively): | Randomized, parallel arm study | 12Â weeks | There was no significant change in TG levels from baseline within each group, however, a significant dose response was noted. n-3 PUFA provided at 2Â g and 4Â g per day resulted in TG reductions by 15 and 20Â %, respectively. | Â |
Age: 21–51 | ||||||
(TG – 87, Total-C - 211) | ||||||
1Â g of n-3 PUFA/day | ||||||
 | Vs. | |||||
2Â g of n-3 PUFA/day | ||||||
Vs. | ||||||
4Â g of n-3 PUFA/day | ||||||
Stark (2000) [55] | 35 Postmenopausal Females | 8 Fish Oil capsules: | Randomized, double blind, placebo controlled, cross-over study | 4Â weeks | n-3 PUFA produced a 26Â % reduction in serum TG levels (sig) | Â |
2.4 g EPA + 1.6 g of DHA | n-3 PUFA produced a 5 % increase in LDL-c levels | |||||
Age: 43–60 | Vs. | |||||
(TG – 120, Total-C - 213, LDL-C - 122) | ||||||
Placebo (primrose oil) | ||||||
Damsgaard (2008) [56] | 66 males | 10 capsules of fish oil (2.0Â g EPA, 1.25Â g DHA) | Randomized, double-blind placebo controlled, 2x2 factorial design | 8Â weeks | TG levels were reduced 19Â % with high LA intake (sig) and 51Â % reduction with low LA intake (sig) | -No change in inflammatory markers |
Age: 19–40 | ||||||
(TG – 89, Total-C - 153, LDL-C - 99) | Vs. | |||||
Placebo | ||||||
Supplementation with either high LA in diet or low LA in diet | No changes in HDL-c, LDL-c, total-c | |||||
Brady (2004) [57] | 29 Males | fish oil capsules | Double-blind, parallel, dietary intervention | 6Â weeks | TG was reduced 20Â % and 25Â % in high and moderate groups, respectively (sig) | Â |
Age: 35–70 | (2.5 g EPA+ DHA) with either: | |||||
Moderate n-6 PUFA diet (olive oil) | ||||||
No changes in HDL-c, LDL-c, total-c | ||||||
(TG – 137, Total-C - 186, LDL-C - 114) | ||||||
Vs. | ||||||
High n-6 PUFA diet (corn oil) | ||||||
Kaul (2008) [58] | 54 females, 34 males | 2, 1Â g capsules per day containing | Randomized, double blind, placebo controlled, parallel arm study | 12Â weeks | Fish oil produced a 4Â % and 7Â % increase in total-c and LDL-c, respectively | No significant change in CRP or TNF-É‘ levels |
Age: 31–36 | ||||||
(TG – 113, Total-C - 184, LDL-C - 102) | Fish oil (0.606 g of n-3 PUFA; 0.242 g of DHA + 0.352 g of EPA) | Flaxseed oil produced a 4 % and 12 % increase in total-c and LDL-c, respectively | No significant change in platelet aggregation stimulated by thrombin or collagen | |||
Hempseed oil produced a 4Â % increase in both total-c and LDL-c and an 18Â % increase in TG | ||||||
Vs. | ||||||
Flaxseed oil (1.02Â g of ALA) | ||||||
Vs. | ||||||
Hempseed oil (0.372Â g of ALA,1.14Â g of LA) | ||||||
Vs. | ||||||
Sunflower oil (1.36Â g of LA) | ||||||
Buckley (2004) [59] | 20 Females, 22 Males | 9 capsules of EPA or DHA-rich oil | Randomized, double bind, placebo controlled, parallel arm | 4Â weeks | EPA treatment: TG decreased 22Â % (sig) | Â |
Age: 20–70 | ||||||
4.8Â g EPA | ||||||
(TG – 106, Total-C - 205, LDL-C - 124) | Vs. | DHA treatment: TG decreased 38 % (sig) | ||||
4.9 g DHA | Total-c decreased (p = 0.06) | |||||
Vs. | ||||||
Placebo | No changes in LDL-c or HDL-c | |||||
Sanders (2006) [60] | 40 Females, 39 Males | 4 capusles of DHA-rich oil from Schizochytrium sp. | Randomized double bind, placebo controlled, parallel arm | 4Â weeks | TG decreased from baseline 14Â % (sig) | Â |
Age: 31 +/− 14 | No changes in total-c or LDL-c levels | |||||
(TG – 89, Total-C – 175, LDL-C – 96) | 1.5 g DHA + 0.6 g DPA | |||||
Vs. | HDL-c increased by 9Â % (sig) | |||||
Placebo | ||||||
Stark (2004) [61] | 32 Postmenopausal Females | 12, 500Â mg Capsules containing DHA from an algal source | Randomized, double blind, placebo controlled, cross-over study | 4Â weeks | DHA decreased TG by 8Â % (sig). | DHA was able to reduce resting heart rate by 7Â % |
Age: 45–70 | ||||||
2.8Â g of DHA | DHA elevated HDL-c by 8Â %, total-c by 4Â % and reducing LDL-c by 8Â % | |||||
(TG - 132, Total-C – 216, LDL-C – 125) | Vs. | |||||
Placebo (corn and soy oil mixture) | ||||||
Wu (2006) [62] | 25 Postmenopausal Vegetarian Females | Capsules providing 6Â g of DHA rich algae oil | Randomized, single blind, placebo controlled study | 6Â weeks | DHA decreased TG by 18Â %, Total-c by 3Â % and LDL-C by 3Â % while elevating HDL-C by 6Â % | No changes in levels of urinary estrogen metabolites, or markers of oxidative stress (e.g. É‘-tocopherol) |
Age: 52 +/− 5 yrs | 2.4 g of DHA | |||||
(TG - 124, Total-C – 158, LDL-C - 90) | ||||||
Vs. | *Only between group analysis was performed | |||||
Placebo (corn oil) | ||||||
Geppert (2006) [63] | 87 Females, 87 Males Vegetarians | 4 capusles of DHA-rich oil from Ulkenia sp. | Randomized, double blind, parallel design, placebo controlled | 8Â weeks | TG reduced 23Â % in the group receiving DHA rich oil (sig). | No significant changes in haemostatic factors |
Age: 28–43 | 0.94 g of DHA | Total cholesterol, LDL-c and HDL-c increased 6-11 % in the group consuming DHA rich oil (sig) | ||||
Vs. | ||||||
(TG - 95, Total-C – 180, LDL-C – 97) | ||||||
Placebo (olive oil) | ||||||
No changes in the placebo group | ||||||
Cazzola (2007) [64] | 93 Young Males, 63 Older Males | 9 capsules of EPA-rich fish oil containing either: | Randomized, double blind, placebo controlled | 12Â weeks | TG levels were reduced ~25Â % after 1.35, 2.7 or 4.05Â g of EPA across all ages (sig) | EPA supplementation tended to decrease soluble ICAM-1 |
a) 1.35Â g EPA | ||||||
Age: Young, 18–42; Old, 53–70 | Vs. | |||||
b) 2.7Â g EPA | ||||||
(TG - 82, Total-C – 162, LDL-C – 103) | Vs. | No effect on HDL-c, LDL-c, or total-c in any group | ||||
c) 4.05Â g EPA | ||||||
Vs. | ||||||
Placebo |