- Open Access
Rosiglitazone and bezafibrate modulate gene expression in a rat model of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease - A historical prospective
- Hemda Schmilovitz-Weiss†1, 2Email author,
- Edith Hochhauser†3,
- Michal Cohen2,
- Yelena Chepurko3,
- Smadar Yitzhaki4,
- Ehud Grossman5,
- Avshalom Leibowitz5,
- Zvi Ackerman6 and
- Ziv Ben-Ari1, 2
© Schmilovitz-Weiss et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
- Received: 9 December 2012
- Accepted: 15 March 2013
- Published: 25 March 2013
Genetic factors implicated in the pathogenesis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease are poorly understood. Our aim was to characterize three genes involved in a rat model of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and investigate the effect of rosiglitazone and bezafibrate.
Five rats were fed a chow diet (controls) and 18 a fructose-enriched diet (FED) for 5 weeks: 6 were administered rosiglitazone and 6 bezafibrate during the last 2 weeks and 6 were not treated at all. Livers were examined by reverse transcription-PCR for the genes encoding peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPAR), PPAR-α, PPAR-γ, and Mn superoxide dismutase2 (Mn SOD2). Western blot was used for proteins levels.
The FED rats showed a decrease in mRNA of MnSOD2, PPAR-α, and PPAR-γ (3, 3.5 fold, and 27%, respectively) (p<0.05). The 3 genes normalized in response to rosiglitazone and bezafibrate. The proteins of MnSOD2, PPAR-α and PPAR-γ in the FED rats decreased (2.5, 2, and 2.2, respectively) (p<0.05). Following administration of rosiglitazone, proteins of MnSOD2, PPAR-α and PPAR-γ in the FED rats increased (reaching 1.5-fold, a 20% increase and normalization, respectively), (p<0.05). Administration of bezafibrate to the FED rats restored the proteins of 3 genes to baseline.
A consistent reduction in hepatic expression of MnSOD2, PPAR-α and PPAR-γ in the FED rats compared with controls was observed. Administration of either rosiglitazone or bezafibrate to the FED rats restored these genes to a pre-morbid state.
- Hepatic steatosis
- Fructose enriched diet
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is considered the hepatic manifestation of the metabolic syndrome . The clinical spectrum of NAFLD ranges from simple steatosis to steatohepatitis, bridging fibrosis, and cirrhosis . The primary event of NAFLD is the accumulation of triglycerides in hepatocytes which appear to be determined by insulin resistance . The secondary event is hepatocellular injury (nonalcoholic steatohepatitis - NASH) involving factors such as oxidative stress, increased proinflammatory cytokines, mitochondrial dysfunction, iron overload, bacterial overgrowth and genetic predisposition . Although metabolic risk factors for NAFLD progression are well known, the role of genetic susceptibility remains unclear [5–7].
Recent studies have implicated the nuclear hormones peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs), PPAR-α and PPAR-γ in the pathogenesis of NAFLD [8–12]. PPAR-α reduces liver fat by increasing β-oxidation of fatty acids. PPAR-γ increases insulin sensitivity, thus reducing fatty acid flux to the liver. Accordingly, PPAR ligands have shown promise in the treatment of NAFLD [13–26].
Rosiglitazone has a high binding affinity with PPAR-γ [8, 11, 13–16, 18, 19]. Fibrates such as bezafibrate exert their effects by activating PPAR-α [8–26]. The oxidative stress induced by steatosis is counteracted by cellular enzymatic and nonenzymatic antioxidant systems. The cytosolic and mitochondrial superoxide dismutases (SODs), in addition to glutathione peroxidase and catalase, eliminate the reactive oxygen species (ROS) formed during the fatty acid oxidation process .
Non-obese rats fed a fructose-enriched diet (FED) have been found to acquire histologically-proven NAFLD and also exhibit certain aspects of the metabolic syndrome, such as hypertension, insulin resistance, and hyper-triglyceridemia .
In this study, samples archived from previous studies from 2005  and 2007 were analyzed . Changes in plasma and hepatic triglycerides and phospholipids have been previously published in response to administration of rosiglitazone and bezafibrate [28, 29]. Histological changes were assessed by modifying the scoring system of the grading and staging of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis as described by Brunt et al. . The histological evaluation of the liver sections was blindly performed .
The livers of the control group (rats fed with a standard rat chow diet, Koffolk) showed no signs of macrovesicular steatosis or fibrosis. The livers of the FED rats showed mild to moderate macrovesicular and microvesicular fat with minimal signs of perisinusoidal fibrosis.
The FED rats had 188% higher plasma triglyceride levels compared to the control group. Changes in liver enzymes were not observed between groups, however, the ratio of alanine to aspartate aminotransferase which was 1.2:1.0 in the control group increased to 2.0:1.0 in the FED rats. The livers of the FED rats had higher concentrations of total lipids (+28%), triglycerides (+198%), and cholesterol (+89%), but lower concentrations of phospholipids (−36%) compared to the livers of the control rats.
Administration of rosiglitazone to the FED rats was associated with decreases in plasma triglycerides (−62%), hepatic total lipids (−19%), hepatic triglycerides
(−61%), and increases in hepatic phospholipids (+46%). Administration of rosiglitazone to the FED rats initiated a decrease in the hepatic macrovesicular steatosis score without an improvement in the relative fibrosis area 
Administration of bezafibrate caused a reduction in plasma (−49%) and hepatic (−78%) triglycerides concentrations and an increase in hepatic phospholipids (+41%) . Administration of bezafibrate resulted in a significant reduction in the hepatic macrovesicular steatosis but no change in the microvesicular steatosis, inflammatory, or fibrosis score .
The aim of this study was to characterize the expression of principle genes encoding enzymes involved in fatty acid metabolism (MnSOD2, PPAR-α and PPAR-γ) in a rat model of NAFLD and record the changes in their levels following administration of either rosiglitazone or bezafibrate.
Animals and experimental protocol
This study was performed on 23 male Sprague–Dawley rats (Harlan Laboratories Ltd., Jerusalem, Israel) weighing 200–280 grams, housed in regular cages, situated in an animal room at 22°C and maintained on a 14-hour light/10-hour dark cycle. The rats were randomly divided into 4 groups. One group, serving as controls, (n=5) was maintained on a standard rat chow diet for 5 weeks (Koffolk, Tel Aviv, Israel) with tap water ad libitum. The other 3 groups (6 rats in each) were given FED for 5 weeks. Three weeks after commencement of FED, one FED group was also given rosiglitazone (10 mg /kg/day) and another group, bezafibrate (10 mg/kg/day), for an additional 2 weeks. Drugs were administered via the drinking water.
All rats were sacrificed after 5 weeks and their livers excised for laboratory analysis. All animal studies were conducted according to the regulations for the use and care of experimental animals (National Institutes of Health Guidelines, USA). Our study used archived specimens from previously conducted studies from 2005  and 2007 . Upon termination of each experiment (animals sacrifice), liver samples of the rats were cut into small sized sections to be preserved either as frozen material (−70°C) or in formalin and as paraffin embedded slices. None of the frozen liver specimens had been subjected to thawing and refreezing. These specimens were still viable for analysis through molecular biology techniques.
All rats were sacrificed after 5 weeks and their livers excised for laboratory analysis. All experiments were carried out in accordance with the guidelines of the Animal Care and Use Committee of the Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Israel
Western blot analysis of protein expression
Liver tissue samples (20 mg per sample) from the 23 rats were homogenized in a lysis buffer and quantified for protein levels using a commercial assay (Bio-Rad, USA). Proteins (50 μg/sample) were separated using SDS-polyacrylamide gels (12.5%) under denaturing conditions and electrotransferred onto nitrocellulose Bio-Rad) for 1 hour at 100 V.
Membranes were blocked with 5% nonfat milk in a tris-buffered saline (TBS) containing 0.1% tween 20 (TBST). The primary antibodies, anti-PPAR-γ, anti-PPAR-α, anti-SOD (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), and anti-β-actin (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) were diluted 1:1000 in TBST with 5% nonfat milk and left overnight at 4°C. After 3 washes in TBST, the membranes were incubated with the secondary antibody for 30 to 60 minutes, as appropriate. Immunodetection and optical density measurement of the appropriately sized bands were performed using the Odyssey infrared imaging system (LI-COR Biosciences, Cambridge, UK).
Quantitative reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
RNA was isolated from the rat livers by mechanical homogenization and extraction in TRIzol. Reverse transcription was performed using the Applied Biosystems High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Kit 4374966; Ambion/Applied Biosystems, Austin, TX, USA). cDNA concentrations were determined with a Nanodrop spectro-photometer (Nanodrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE 19810 United States) followed by absolute quantitative real-time PCR performed with the 9700HT instrument (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) set to the default 40-cycle program. TaqMan gene expression assays were purchased from Applied Biosystems: PPAR-α, Mm0481934; PPAR-γ, Mm00713303; SOD1 4352932E. Expression levels were normalized to the TATA box binding protein (TBP) reference gene (assay Mm00446973_m1). For each amplicon, PCR efficiency was estimated to be near 1.0 by serial dilutions of cDNA. Relative quantities of mRNA were estimated using the delta CT method.
The rats were handled at the Hypertension Research Laboratory of the Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer and their livers were kindly donated by E. Grossman (co-author) . Z. Ackerman (co-author) characterized the rats clinically and histopathologically [28, 29]. All experiments were carried out in accordance with the guidelines of the Animal Care and Use Committee of the Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Israel.
The analyzed samples in the current study were archived from previous studies from 2005  and 2007 . The stored frozen and formalin fixed liver tissues were processed for gene expression analysis at the cardiac and liver Research Laboratory, Felsenstein Medical Research Center, Petah Tikva, Israel.
Data are given as means ± standard deviations. Statistically significant differences in mean values of the variables between the groups were assessed by one way analysis of variance (ANOVA). If differences were found, values were then compared using the Student’s t-test, p < 0.05 was considered significant.
The present study demonstrates a statistically significant downregulation of hepatic MnSOD2, PPAR-α and PPAR-γ mRNA expression in FED rats with NAFLD compared with controls. Following administration of either rosiglitazone or bezafibrate, the expression of all three genes normalized. A statistically significant decrease in hepatic protein levels of all three genes in the FED rats compared with controls was also demonstrated. Administration of both rosiglitazone and bezafibrate to the FED rats restored to baseline or increased the levels of all three proteins.
Kohjima et al.  reported a reduction in PPAR-α expression but no change in PPAR-γ expression in cirrhotic patients with NAFLD.
Earlier studies reported a marked increase in PPAR-γ expression in fatty livers [20, 21] as to the mRNA level and function of the related protein. Conversely, adipogenesis resulting in triglyceride storage occurred under conditions of decreased PPAR-α activity and fatty acid oxidation , implying cross-talk between PPAR-γ and PPAR-α.
Our results are consistent with reports of a loss of PPAR-α gene expression in mice with hepatic steatosis under fasting or high-fat diet conditions [10, 17] and a decrease in hepatic steatosis in mice on a methionine- and choline- deficient diet after administration of a potent PPAR agonist [8, 18, 19]. These observations indicate that in the presence of increased hepatic fatty acid influx or decreased hepatic fatty acid efflux activation, PPAR-α prevents accumulation of triglycerides by increasing the rate of fatty acid catabolism.
Our results are in accordance with Tipoe et al.  who studied rats fed on a high-fat diet, and found significantly decreased SOD1 and SOD2. This effect was reversed by pioglitazone co-administration. In contrast, Kohjima et al.  observed a 5-fold increase in SOD expression in human NAFLD. Sreekumar et al.  however, as in the present study, found a decreased expression of SOD1 in cirrhotic livers of patients with NASH.
Videla et al.  correlated hepatic and plasma oxidative stress-related parameters with clinical and histological findings in 31 patients with NAFLD, finding that liver SOD activity decreased in the entire group by 48% compared with the controls (p<0.05) and by 64% in patients with steatohepatitis (n=16) (p<0.05). The authors concluded that oxidative stress develops in the livers of patients with steatosis and is exacerbated in patients with steatohepatitis associated with Cytochrome P450 2E1 (CYP2E1) induction. The substantial protein oxidation followed by proteolysis of the modified proteins could account for the coexistence of diminished antioxidant capacity and protein oxidation in the liver of patients with steatohepatitis.
Most of the data on PPAR-α and hepatic lipid homeostasis originates from rodent models. There are, however, important differences in PPAR-α activity between rodents and humans. PPAR-α DNA binding activity and PPAR-α expression in human hepatocytes is 10-fold less than observed in mice [36–38]. In addition, certain PPAR response elements do not respond to PPAR ligands in humans as they do in rodent models.
It may be argued that apart from species differences between human and rodent hepatic genes, the contradictory results among studies may be explained by differences in the degree of damage to the fatty liver. Our rats were sacrificed on the 35th day of the study, and the only overt histological finding was macrovesicular steatosis which was mitigated in the treated animals [28, 29].
In the present study, administration of either rosiglitazone or bezafibrate was associated with a return to baseline level or higher, in all 3 examined genes. These findings provide evidence for a transcriptional or pre-transcriptional basis of impaired mitochondrial function (attenuated capacity for the dismutation of ROS and diminished insulin sensitivity, reversed by the insulin sensitizer, rosiglitazone) in rats with NAFLD. Thus, the post-treatment amelioration of hepatic steatosis in Ackerman et al’s  study may be attributable to the restoration of the hepatic gene levels to their pre-morbid state.
Our study has several limitations. The number of rats in each group was relatively small. The original experiments included a larger sample size (controls −11, FED- 10, FED and rosiglitazone- 9, FED and bezafibrate −10) [28, 29], however, the livers of some of the rats were already spent for previously described analyses and only 5 or 6 per group were left for current analyses. Nonetheless, there were no intra-group significant differences in all parameters examined, thus strengthening the validity of our results.
The analyzed samples in the current study were archived from previous studies. None of the frozen liver specimens stored in the laboratory had been subjected to thawing and refreezing. These specimens were still viable for analysis through molecular biology techniques, even though they are known for being highly sensitive to organic degradation. The consistency of the results of the analyses conducted in our laboratory supports our confidence in the reliability of the techniques and the preservation of the frozen tissue.
The results reported in the study relate to one point in time: termination of the experiment (animals sacrifice). No liver samples (biopsies) were taken while the animals were alive. There were no time response or dose response samples relating to the administration of rosiglitazone or bezafibrate.
The FED rat model of NAFLD was imperfect because the rats did not gain weight but nevertheless showed other basic and prominent characteristics of the metabolic syndrome.
In FED rats with NAFLD, the reduced hepatic expression might be associated with diminished antioxidant capacity and alteration of peroxisomal fatty acid metabolism. All three genes studied are involved in the pathogenesis of NAFLD. Our results imply that the beneficial therapeutic effects of PPAR agonists in patients with NAFLD may be attributed to reversing and normalizing levels of the relevant hepatic genes.
The authors thank Mrs Phyllis Curchack Kornspan for her editorial services.
- Marchesini G, Bugianesi E, Forlani G, Cerrelli F, Lenzi M, Manini R, Natale S, Vanni E, Villanova N, Melchionda N, Rizzetto M: Nonalcoholic fatty liver, steatohepatitis, and the metabolic syndrome. Hepatology. 2003, 37: 917-923. 10.1053/jhep.2003.50161View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Green RM: NASH-hepatic metabolism and not simply the metabolic syndrome. Hepatology. 2003, 38: 14-17.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Angulo P: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. NEJM. 2002, 346: 1221-1231. 10.1056/NEJMra011775View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tamura S, Shimomura I: Contribution of adipose tissue and de novo lipogenesis to nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J Clin Invest. 2005, 115: 1139-1142.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Browning JD, Szczepaniak LS, Dobbins R, Nuremberg P, Horton JD, Cohen JC, Grundy SM, Hobb HH: Prevalence of hepatic steatosis in an urban population in the United States: impact of ethnicity. Hepatology. 2004, 40: 1387-1395. 10.1002/hep.20466View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kotronen A, Peltonen M, Hakkarainen A, Sevastianova K, Bergholm R, Johansson LM, Lundbom N, Rissanen A, Ridderstrale M, Groop L, Orho-Melander M, Yki-Jarvinen H: Prediction of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and liver fat using metabolic and genetic factors. Gastroenterology. 2009, 137: 865-872. 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.06.005View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wagenknecht LE, Scherzinger AL, Stamm ER, Hanley AJ, Norris JM, Chen YD, Bryer-Ash M, Haffner SM, Rotter JI: Correlates and heritability of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in a minority cohort. Obesity. 2009, 17: 1240-1246.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ip E, Farrell G, Hall P, Robertson G, Leclercq I: Administration of the potent PPAR alpha agonist, Wy-14, 643, reverses nutritional fibrosis and steatohepatitis in mice. Hepatology. 2004, 39: 1286-1296. 10.1002/hep.20170View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Larter CZ, Yeh MM, Cheng J, Williams J, Brown S, dela Pena A, Bell-Anderson KS, Farrell GC: Activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha by dietary fish oil attenuates steatosis, but does not prevent experimental steatohepatitis because of hepatic lipoperoxide accumulation. J Gastro Hepatology. 2008, 23: 267-275. 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2007.05157.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vimaleswaran KS, Radha V, Ghosh S, Majumder PP, Deepa R, Babu HN, Rao MR, Mohan V: Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma co-activator-1alpha (PGC-1alpha) gene polymorphisms and their relationship to Type 2 diabetes in Asian Indians. Diabet Med. 2005, 22: 1516-1521. 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2005.01709.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mitsuyoshi H, Yasui K, Harano Y, Endo M, Tsuji K, Minami M, Itoh Y, Okanoue T, Yoshikawa T: Analysis of hepatic genes involved in the metabolism of fatty acids and iron in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatol Res. 2009, 39: 366-373. 10.1111/j.1872-034X.2008.00464.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kallwitz ER, McLachlan A, Cotler SJ: Role of peroxisome proliferators-activated receptors in the pathogenesis and treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2008, 14: 22-28. 10.3748/wjg.14.22PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fonseca V, Rosenstock J, Patwardhan R, Salzman A: Effect of metformin and rosiglitazone combination therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2000, 283: 1695-1702. 10.1001/jama.283.13.1695View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Higgins LS, Depaoli AMM: Selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma) modulation as a strategy for safer therapeutic PPARgamma activation. Amer J Clin Nutr. 2010, 91: 267S-272S. 10.3945/ajcn.2009.28449EView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Combs TP, Wagner JA, Berger J, Doebber T, Wang WJ, Zhang BB, Tanen M, Berg AH, O'Rahilly S, Savage DB, Chatterjee K, Weiss S, Larson PJ, Gottesdiener KM, Gertz BJ, Charron MJ, Scherer PE, Moller DE: Induction of adipocyte complement- related protein of 30 kilodaltons by PPAR agonists: A potential mechanism of insulin sensitization. Endocrinology. 2002, 143: 998-1007. 10.1210/en.143.3.998PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Giaginis C, Theocharis S, Tsantili-Kakoulidou A: Investigation of the lipophilic behaviour of some thiazolidinediones. Relationships with PPAR-gamma activity. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2007, 857: 181-187. 10.1016/j.jchromb.2007.07.013View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ip E, Farrell GC, Robertson G, Hall P, Kirsch R, Leclercq I: Central role of PPARalpha-dependent hepatic lipid turnover in dietary steatohepatitis in mice. Hepatology. 2003, 38: 123-132.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Harano Y, Yasui K, Toyama T, Nakajima T, Mitsuyoshi H, Mimani M, Hirasawa T, Itoh Y, Okanoue T: Fenofibrate, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha agonist, reduces hepatic steatosis and lipid peroxidation in fatty liver Shionogi mice with hereditary fatty liver. Liver Int. 2006, 26: 613-620. 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2006.01265.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Assy N, Grozovski M, Bersudsky I, Szvalb S, Hussein O: Effect of insulin-sensitizing agents in combination with ezetimibe, and valsartan in rats with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2006, 12: 4369-4376.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schoonjans K, Staels B, Auwerx J: The peroxisome proliferator activated receptors (PPARs) and their effects on lipid metabolism and adipocyte differentiation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1996, 1302: 93-109. 10.1016/0005-2760(96)00066-5View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schoonjans K, Staels B, Auwerx J: Role of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) in mediating the effects of fibrates and fatty acids on gene expression. J Lipid Res. 1996 May, 37 (5): 907-925.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Staels B, Dallongeville J, Auwerx J, Schoonjans K, Leitersdorf E, Fruchart JC: Mechanism of action of fibrates on lipid and lipoprotein metabolism. Circulation. 1998, 98: 2088-2093. 10.1161/01.CIR.98.19.2088View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Latruffe N, Vamecq J: Peroxisome proliferators and peroxisome proliferator activated receptors (PPARs) as regulators of lipid metabolism. Biochimie. 1997, 79: 381-394.Google Scholar
- Maragoudakis ME, Hankin H: On the mode of action of lipid-lowering agents. Kinetics of the inhibition in vitro of rat acetyl coenzyme A carboxylase. J Biol Chem. 1971, 246: 348-358.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Heller F, Harvengt C: Effects of clofibrate, bezafibrate, fenofibrate and probucol on plasma lipolytic enzymes in normolipaemic subjects. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1983, 25: 57-63. 10.1007/BF00544015View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Staels B, Vu-Dac N, Kosykh VA, Saladin R, Fruchart JC, Dallongeville J, Auwerx J: Fibrates downregulate apoli-poprotein C-III expression independent of induction of peroxisomal acyl coenzyme A oxidase. A potential mechanism for the hypolipidemic action of fibrates. J Clin Invest. 1995, 95: 705-712. 10.1172/JCI117717PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Perlemuter G, Davit-Spraul A, Cosson C, Conti M, Bigorgne A, Paradis V, Corre MP, Prat L, Kuoch V, Basdevant A, Pelletier G, Oppert JM, Buffet C: Increase in liver antioxidant enzyme activities in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Liver Int. 2005, 25: 946-953. 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2005.01126.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ackerman Z, Oron-Herman M, Grozovski M, Rosenthal T, Pappo O, Link G, Sela BA: Fructose-induced fatty liver disease: hepatic effects of blood pressure and plasma triglyceride reduction. Hypertension. 2005, 45: 1012-1018. 10.1161/01.HYP.0000164570.20420.67View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ackerman Z, Oron-Herman M, Pappo O, Peleg E, Safadi R, Schmilovitz-Weiss H, Grozovski M: Hepatic effects of rosiglitazone in rats with the metabolic syndrome. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2010, 107: 663-668. 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2010.00553.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brunt EM, Janney CG, Di Bisceglie AM, Neuschwander-Tetri BA, Bacon BR: Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: a proposal for grading and staging the histological lesions. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999, 94: 2467-2474. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.01377.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Oron-Herman M, Kamari Y, Grossman E: Metabolic syndrome: comparison of the two commonly used animal models. Amer J Hypertens. 2008, 21: 1018-1022. 10.1038/ajh.2008.218. 10.1038/ajh.2008.218View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kohjima M, Enjoji M, Higuchi N: Re-evaluation of fatty acid metabolism-related gene expression in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Int J Mol Med. 2007, 20: 351-358.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tipoe GL, Ho CT, Liong EC, Leung TM, Lau TY, Fung ML, Nanji AAG: Voluntary oral feeding of rats not requiring a very high fat diet is a clinically relevant animal model of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Histol Histopathol. 2009, 24: 1161-1169.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sreekumar R, Rosado B, Rasmussen D, Charlton M: Hepatic gene expression in histologically progressive nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatology. 2004, 38: 244-251.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Videla LA, Rodrigo R, Orellana M, Fernandez V, Tapia G, Quiñones L, Varela N, Contreras J, Lazarte R, Csendes A, Rojas J, Maluenda F, Burdiles P, Diaz JC, Smok G, Thielemann L, Poniachik J: Oxidative stress-related parameters in the liver of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease patients. Clin Sci (Lond). 2004, 106: 261-268. 10.1042/CS20030285. 10.1042/CS20030285View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Palmer CN, Hsu MH, Griffin KJ, Raucy JL, Johnson EF: Peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-alpha expression in human liver. Mol Pharmacol. 1998, 53: 14-22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lawrence JW, Li Y, Chen S, De Luca JG, Berger JP, Umbenhauer DR, Moller DE, Zhou G: Differential gene regulation in human versus rodent hepatocytes by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) alpha. PPAR alpha fails to induce peroxisome proliferation-associated genes in human cells independently of the level of receptor expresson. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276: 31521-31527. 10.1074/jbc.M103306200View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rakhshandehroo M, Hooiveld G, Müller M, Kersten S: Comparative analysis of gene regulation by the transcription factor PPARalpha between mouse and human. PLoS One. 2009, 4: e6796- 10.1371/journal.pone.0006796PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.